Gender-affirming care providers lose proposed protections as Maine lawmakers vote down bill / by Dan Neumann

Morgin Dupont, 25, a trans woman, holds up the flag for Transgender and Gender Noncomforming people at a rally for LGBTQI+ rights at Washington Square Park | Yana Paskova, Getty Images

Reposted from the Maine Beacon


The Maine Legislature’s Judiciary Committee on Thursday voted down a bill that would have compelled Maine not to cooperate with law enforcement from states that have banned gender-affirming care who are investigating people who have sought such treatment here. 

LD 1735, a bill sponsored by Democratic Rep. Laurie Osher of Orono, was a top priority for transgender rights advocates this session and it was backed by several groups, including the Maine Nurse Practitioner Association, the Maine Psychological Association, and the National Association of Social Workers.  

Republican lawmakers fiercely opposed the bill. They held a press conference on Thursday before the committee vote. According to the Advocate, the debate over the bill was seemingly influenced by a social media campaign led by Chaya Raichik, the Libs of TikTok account operator. On Jan. 16, Raichik galvanized her 2.8 million followers to take action against the proposed legislation.

Speaking last May when she introduced the legislation, Osher said that “at its heart, LD 1735 is about protecting the wellbeing and medical privacy of young people and their families.” Osher, the leader of the Legislature’s LGBTQ Equality Caucus, also said at last May’s public hearing that right now, “While other states are actively criminalizing safe, medically necessary healthcare, the stakes are higher than ever.”

For LGBTQ rights groups, Osher’s bill would have expanded on progress made last year in the Maine Legislature to secure rights for trans youth. Lawmakers passed a law allowing access to gender-affirming care without parental consent or notification for 16- and 17-year-olds. This is similar to Maine laws regarding abortion access or contraception for minors.

With Osher’s bill, Maine would have joined 12 other states that have enacted legal protections for gender-affirming care providers. 

“We’ve received an alarming number of requests from families from states like Florida, Georgla, Idaho, and Kentucky looking for somewhere safe to bring their children. These families are terrified about being split up,” Quinn Gormley, executive director of MaineTransNet, said in a public hearing last year.

Gormley added, “This bill is an opportunity for Maine to lead again. It’s our chance to send a clear message that hate isn’t welcome here.”

The Judiciary Committee, chaired by Sen. Anne Carney and Rep. Matt Moonen, both Democrats, unanimously voted across party lines to reject the legislation. Democrats, who had initially backed the bill, stated on Thursday that it included unnecessary language for the purpose of safeguarding transgender healthcare in Maine, leading to their decision to oppose it.


Dan Neumann studied journalism at Colorado State University before beginning his career as a community newspaper reporter in Denver. He reported on the Global North’s interventions in Africa, including documentaries on climate change, international asylum policy and U.S. militarization on the continent before returning to his home state of Illinois to teach community journalism on Chicago’s West Side. He now lives in Portland. Dan can be reached at dan@mainebeacon.com.