Israel ‘Has Gone to War Against the Entire Palestinian People’: Sanders / by Olivia Rosane

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) delivers a speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate on March 6, 2023 | Photo: Sen. Bernie Sanders/YouTube Screengrab

“Any objective observer knows Israel has broken international law, it has broken American law, and, in my view, Israel should not be receiving another nickle in U.S. military aid,” Sanders said.

Reposted from Common Dreams


Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders repeated his calls on Sunday for the U.S. to cut off military aid to the far-right government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as it continues its devastating war on Gaza.

Sanders spoke on NBC’s “Meet the Press” in response to a U.S. State Department report released Friday, which found that it was “reasonable to assess” that Israel had used U.S. weapons to violate international humanitarian law in Gaza but that the U.S. was “not able to reach definitive conclusions” as to whether U.S. weapons had been used in any specific incidents.

“Any objective observer knows Israel has broken international law, it has broken American law, and, in my view, Israel should not be receiving another nickle in U.S. military aid,” Sanders said.

Friday’s report came in response to National Security Memorandum 20 (NSM-20), in which President Joe Biden tasked Secretary of State Antony Blinken with obtaining “certain credible and reliable written assurances from foreign governments” that they use U.S. arms in line with international humanitarian law and will not “arbitrarily deny, restrict, or otherwise impede, directly or indirectly, the transport or delivery of United States humanitarian assistance.”

The report, made to Congress, was criticized by human rights organizations who said it mischaracterized both the law and the facts in order to avoid imposing consequences on Israel for waging a war on Gaza that the International Court of Justice has determined could plausibly amount to genocide.

“The people of our country do not want to be complicit in the starvation of hundreds of thousands of children.”

Amanda Klasing, Amnesty International USA’s national director of government relations and advocacy, called it the “international version of ‘thoughts and prayers.'” Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) called it “woefully inadequate” and told reporters, “If this conduct complies with international standards, God help us all.”

Speaking before Sanders on “Meet the Press,” Blinken denied that the report was an attempt to get out of holding Israel accountable.

“What the report concludes is that, based on the totality of the harm that’s been done to children, to women, to men who are caught in this crossfire of Hamas’ making, it’s reasonable to conclude that there are instances where Israel has acted in ways that are not consistent with international humanitarian law,” Blinken said.

He added that both Israel and the U.S. would continue to investigate those incidents.

“When we can reach definitive conclusions, we will,” Blinken said, “but it’s very difficult to do that in the midst of a war.”

In response to Blinken’s remarks, Sanders countered that “the facts are quite clear.”

He said that Hamas was a “terrible, disgusting terrorist organization” and blamed it for starting the war. But he argued that Israel’s response had been beyond disproportionate.

“What Israel has done over the last seven months is not just gone to war against Hamas—it has gone to war against the entire Palestinian people, and the results have been absolutely catastrophic,” the senator told NBC.

Sanders went on to outline some of that catastrophe: a death toll that surpassed 35,000 on Sunday, with two-thirds of the dead women and children; the destruction of around 60% of all housing; the devastation of infrastructure such a as water and sewage as well as the healthcare and education systems; and the fact that hundreds of thousands of children are now at risk of starvation.

Sanders referred to Section 6201 of the Foreign Assistance Act: “Any country that blocks U.S. humanitarian aid is in violation of law and should not continue to receive military aid from the United States,” Sanders explained. “That is precisely what Israel has done.”

Sanders’ remarks came as Israel escalated its assault on Gaza over the weekend, issuing new evacuation orders in both Rafah and areas in the north. Biden has said that a major ground invasion into Rafah would be a “red line” and threatened to withhold certain kinds of weapons if Netanyahu ordered such an invasion, but Palestinian and human rights advocates say that Israel’s current actions in Rafah should already count as a major ground operation.

Speaking on “Meet the Press,” Blinken acknowledged that the U.S. had not seen a “credible plan” from Israel to safely evacuate the more than 1.4 million civilians sheltering in Rafah ahead of an invasion.

Sanders told NBC that he thought many Republicans and also some Democrats wanted Israel to invade Rafah, but that this was not an opinion shared by the majority of people in the U.S.

“Poll after poll suggests that the American people want an immediate cease-fire. They want massive humanitarian aid to get in,” Sanders said. “The people of our country do not want to be complicit in the starvation of hundreds of thousands of children.”


Olivia Rosane is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Western Governments Share Responsibility for Israel’s Crimes / by Hamza Ali Shah

A view of the heavily damaged Al-Huda Mosque as a result of Israeli attacks on Rafah, Gaza, on February 14, 2024. (Abed Rahim Khatib / Anadolu via Getty Images)

Israel is preparing to launch a ground assault against the Palestinian town of Rafah, where one million refugees are sheltered. It will likely mean a surge in civilians deaths — for which the US and other Western governments also will be culpable.

Reposted from Jacobin


On Sunday night, the Israeli army carried out a series of intensive strikes in multiple locations in the southern Gaza city of Rafah. Political commentators referred to the strikes as “diversion” tactics, intended to cover a rescue operation that reportedly brought two Israeli hostages home.

For Palestinians, the experience was one that has become familiar: a “night full of horror.” More than a hundred people were killed, including entire families. Journalists were once again hit: Al Jazeera correspondent Ismail Abu Omar was forced to have his right leg amputated, adding to what has already been dubbed an “amputee crisis” in the enclave.

This was just the precursor. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government have set their sights on a full-blown invasion of Rafah. The plans are justified by robotic recitations about the need to eradicate Hamas, a call now synonymous with the constant waves of horrific violence being unleashed against Gaza’s civilian population.

More than four months of the onslaught have already passed, but the bloodbath in Rafah — previously designated a “safe zone” — is likely to be on a scale beyond what we have seen thus far. There are more than a million Palestinians in Rafah, many of whom have already fled homes multiple times to escape Israel’s bombardment. In the process the city has turned into the largest refugee camp on Earth. The UN has sounded the alarm about the “slaughter” on the horizon.

Complicity in Genocide

In these circumstances, Western political figures seem to have miraculously discovered their spines. US president Joe Biden has cautioned that “a major military operation in Rafah should not proceed without a credible plan for ensuring the safety and support of more than one million people sheltering there,” while the UK government declares itself “very concerned,” and the Labour Party calls the prospect of an offensive in Rafah “unacceptable.”

Despite these words, nobody should be under any illusions. The atrocities committed in Rafah already and those to follow, both there and across the wider Gaza Strip, would not be possible without the unconditional support these leaders and parties have provided to Israel and are still providing, even as the language changes.

“Israel has the right to defend itself. We must make sure they have what they need to protect their people,: Biden announced on October 22. By that point, nearly five thousand Palestinians had already been killed, and evacuation orders for hospitals had been issued, in what amounted to “death penalties” for patients according to the Red Crescent.

The Israeli military was making no effort to obscure its intentions. “Gaza will become a place where no human being can exist,” boasted one former Isreal Defense Forces general. “There will only be destruction. You wanted hell; you will get hell,” declared another. These goals were acted on swiftly: a spokesperson for the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs warned in November that Gaza had already become “hell on Earth.”

What should have been a prompt from the UN and plenty of other humanitarian bodies for the West to intervene and try to stop the bloodshed didn’t even shift the dial. Biden bypassed Congress twice in December to approve emergency weapons sales to Israel. Repeated calls from human rights organizations for the British government to suspend arms sales were ignored (Britain has exported £489 million worth of arms to Israel since 2015), and the British government has continued to provide training to Israeli military officers.

Meanwhile, whenever an opportunity to apply global pressure on Israel to end the violence presented itself, it was closed off by Israel’s Western allies with predictable rapidity. When a United Nations Security Council resolution demanded an immediate cease-fire, the United States used its veto power to ensure it did not pass. In the UK, a motion put forward by the Scottish National Party calling for an immediate cease-fire was comprehensively rejected in the House of Commons by a majority of 168. When Israel was facing global isolation as South Africa presented a meticulous case at the International Cou­­rt of Justice (ICJ) accusing Israel of genocide, the German government was quick to dismiss the accusation, and when the interim ruling confirmed a plausible risk of genocide in Gaza, a British foreign office spokesperson expressed “considerable concerns” with the ICJ’s case.

Perhaps worse than the political cover is the conscious decisions these states have taken to make life worse for Palestinians suffering the onslaught. Following allegations from the Israeli government — which remain unsubstantiated — that employees of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) were involved in the October 7 attacks, numerous Western governments including Australia, the UK, the United States, Italy, Austria, and Germany suspended their funding, crippling one of the refugees’ few remaining lifelines.

Amnesty International has since denounced the states’ “cruel” decision. The UN agency is the main humanitarian relief provider in Gaza and was already struggling to cater to the needs of Palestinians, especially given only a “trickle of aid” has been entering Gaza as the bombardment goes on. The UN aid chief described Gaza as the worst ever humanitarian crisis back in December: now, Palestinians on the ground are resorting to eating grass and animal feed and drinking polluted water, while newborn babies are dying from hunger and disease as famine looms.

Only after all this — when 175,000 homes or 50 percent of Gaza’s buildings have been destroyed, when close to thirty thousand have been killed, when twenty-five thousand children have been orphaned, and when more than ten children are losing limbs every day — have these supposed defenders of human rights and democracy begun to shift their tone.

In this context, it is hard to understand cautionary statements about the Rafah offensive as motivated by genuine concern for the safety of Palestinians: Western leaders have already proved themselves to have none. Instead, we should understand them as an attempt by the politicians who offered “unqualified support” to the Israeli military and encouraged collective punishment to absolve themselves of their obvious and overwhelming responsibility in the devastation.

The most obvious evidence of this is that these cautionary statements are unaccompanied by any threats to withdraw the political and moral support on which Israel depends. The Biden administration has already stated it won’t reprimand Israel for failing to protect civilian safety. With domestic demands for action opposing Israel’s crimes growing, the change in tone is not borne out of conviction but political expediency.

The genocide in Gaza is unique in that every devastating chapter has been documented extensively and made available for the world to see. Every crime has played out exactly as boasted about by its perpetrators. Despite all this, the Western world has persisted and continues to persist with the material and political support that has made it all possible.

Tentative rhetoric about safety unbacked by material change now will not cut it. The Palestinian blood on the hands of our politicians will never wash away.


Hamza Ali Shah is a political researcher at a think tank and a masters student at King’s College London.