Senate Plans Hearing on ‘Healthcare Nightmare’ From GOP Abortion Bans / by Jessica Corbett

U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) arrive for a hearing in Washington, D.C. on March 22, 2023 | Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images

Reposted from Common Dreams


It’s been nearly two years since the U.S. Supreme Court reversedRoe v. Wade, triggering a fresh wave of Republican restrictions on abortion at the state level—the topic of a Senate hearing that progressive leaders are planning for next week.

Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the panel’s former leader, announced Wednesday that the hearing—titled, “The Assault on Women’s Freedoms: How Abortion Bans Have Created a Healthcare Nightmare Across America”—will be held on June 4 at 10:00 am ET.

While the witness list has not been released yet, Sanders and Murray previewed the event in a joint statement, saying that “in the two years since Roe was overturned, Republican abortion bans have created a full-blown healthcare crisis—forcing providers to close their doors and shut down their practices, putting women’s lives in danger, decimating access to maternal healthcare, and forcing women to remain pregnant, no matter their circumstances.”

The June 2022 majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and “Republican abortion bans have forced women to leave their states under duress or wait until they are near death to receive care,” the pair noted. “Providers have been forced to make gut-wrenching decisions about whether to risk jail time to help a woman access the healthcare she needs.”

As of May 1, just nine states and Washington, D.C. don’t ban abortion or impose gestational limits, according to the Guttmacher Institute. That means 41 states have restrictions: 14 have total bans; seven ban abortion at or before 18 weeks; and 20 ban it after 18 weeks. Some states have exceptions for rape, incest, and the health of the pregnant person—though providers and patients have stressed that such policies often don’t actually help those seeking care.

“The harm of Dobbs has extended far beyond states with extreme abortion bans” Sanders and Murray pointed out. “In places where abortion remains legal, women are waiting longer for care and providers are struggling to keep up with a dramatically increased patient load.”

As Common Dreamsreported last week, after Florida’s six-week ban went into effect at the beginning of this month, wait times increased at 30% of the abortion clinics in the closest states and the driving distance for the average Floridian increased by nearly 30 times to 590 miles.

The influx of “healthcare refugees” is impacting places like Illinois, where Planned Parenthood saw its out-of-state patients jump from about 6% to nearly a third each month in the wake of Dobbs. Jennifer Welch, the provider’s president and CEO, said in December 2022 that “the number of patients from other states forced to travel to our health centers is at a historic high.”

As the GOP has worked to further restrict reproductive freedom since Dobbs, protecting and expanding such rights has become a top priority for voters across the country. For the 2024 cycle, campaigners in several states are focused on ballot measures affirming the right to abortion and other care, while Democratic President Joe Biden and the presumed Republican nominee, former President Donald Trump, have campaigned on their respective records.

Though some of Biden’s public statements have frustrated rights advocates, the president supports access to abortion care. Trump, meanwhile, has both bragged about appointing three of the six justices who reversed Roe but also recognized the risks of openly backing the most extreme bans—as his allies plot major attacks on reproductive rights if he returns to office.

“The threats to a woman’s right to make her own decisions about her body and her future keep coming—right now Republicans are working to rip away access to safe medication abortion, block women from receiving emergency abortion care that could save their lives, ban abortion nationwide, and restrict access to contraception,” Sanders and Murray warned.

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to soon rule on one case that could restrict access to mifepristone, a medication commonly used for abortions, and another case about whether abortion care is included in the “necessary stabilizing treatment” that emergency healthcare departments are required to provide under federal law, as the Biden administration argues.

“And Republican attacks on basic healthcare are only escalating,” Sanders and Murray said. “The anti-abortion movement has shown its cruelty and utter disregard for women’s lives again and again, and it is essential that we use every opportunity to continue to make clear exactly how extreme right-wing abortion bans and restrictions on reproductive healthcare have endangered women, hurt families, and rolled back rights.”

“We must continue to shine a light on the living nightmare extreme right-wing abortion bans and other healthcare restrictions have been for women across the country,” they concluded, “and do everything we can to restore every woman’s right to make her own healthcare decisions.”


Jessica Corbett is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.

‘Chilling’: Supreme Court Says Idaho Can Jail Doctors for Providing Abortions / by Jake Johnson

Abortion rights advocates protest the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade on July 2, 2022 in Driggs, Idaho | Photo: Natalie Behring/Getty Images

Reposted from Common Dreams


“Yet again, women’s lives are at the mercy of this extreme Court stacked by Donald Trump.”

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday opted to reinstate Idaho’s near-total abortion ban, a draconian law that carries up to five years in prison for doctors who perform the procedure outside of extremely narrow circumstances.

The high court, which overturned the constitutional right to abortion in the summer of 2022, agreed to hear a Justice Department challenge to Idaho’s abortion ban in April. In the meantime, it will be a crime in Idaho to perform or attempt to perform an abortion unless the procedure is deemed “necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman” or if the pregnancy was a result of rape or incest.

“SCOTUS just allowed Idaho to throw health care providers in jail for providing emergency abortion care while they consider this case,” Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) wrote in response to the Supreme Court’s order. “This is a chilling reminder that the anti-abortion movement doesn’t care if women live or die—as long as they’re forced to give birth.”

The Justice Department argued in its lawsuit that Idaho’s abortion ban conflicts with a federal law requiring Medicare-funded hospitals to provide certain stabilizing treatments, including abortion care.

“Beyond care necessary to prevent death, the law provides no defense whatsoever when the health of the pregnant patient is at stake,” the department’s legal challenge reads. “And, even in dire situations that might qualify for the Idaho law’s limited ‘necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman’ affirmative defense, some providers could withhold care based on a well-founded fear of criminal prosecution.”

The department warned that if Idaho’s law is permitted to stay in effect, it will prevent healthcare professionals from performing abortions “even when a doctor determines that abortion is the medically necessary treatment to prevent severe risk to the patient’s health and even in cases where denial of care will likely result in death for the pregnant patient.”

The Supreme Court’s unsigned order came days after the conservative-dominated 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Texas can ban abortions even in emergency situations. In Texas and across the U.S., people have faced dangerous health complications after being denied abortion care due to Republican-authored laws in their states.

Many have been forced to travel out of state to obtain care. One Idaho woman “sought an abortion in [Oregon] after doctors told her she would likely miscarry and, if she continued the pregnancy, develop a life-threatening condition,” The Idaho Statesmanreported last month.

“Her trip to Oregon put so much financial strain on the family, they were unable to pay their mortgage for a month,” the newspaper added.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said Friday that the Supreme Court’s order allowing Idaho’s ban to take effect is “dangerous and exceptionally cruel.”

“Now, doctors in the state cannot perform abortions even in medical emergencies,” Warren added. “Yet again, women’s lives are at the mercy of this extreme Court stacked by Donald Trump.”


Jake Johnson is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.