The Entry of a New German Left Party Shakes up the Country / by Vijay Prashad

Photograph Source: Martin Heinlein – CC BY 2.0

Reposted from Counterpunch


In October 2023, 10 members of the German parliament (Bundestag) left Die Linke (the Left) and declared their intention to form their own party. With their departure, Die Linke’s parliamentary group fell to 28 out of the 736 members of the Bundestag, compared to the 78 members of the far-right Alliance for Germany (AfD). One of the reasons for the departure of these 10 MPs is that they believe that Die Linke has lost touch with its working-class base, whose decomposition over issues of war and inflation has moved many of them into the arms of the AfD. The new formation is led by Sahra Wagenknecht (born 1969), one of the most dynamic politicians of her generation in Germany and a former star in Die Linke, and Amira Mohamed Ali. It is called the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance for Reason and Justice (Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht, BSW) and it launched in early January 2024.

Wagenknecht’s former comrades in Die Linke accuse her of “conservatism” because of her views on immigration in particular. As we will see, though, Wagenknecht contests this description of her approach. The description of “left-wing conservatism” (articulated by Dutch professor Cas Mudde) is frequently deployed, although not elaborated upon by her critics. I spoke to Wagenknecht and her close ally—Sevim Dağdelen—about their new party and their hopes to move a progressive agenda in Germany.

Anti-War

The heart of our conversation rested on the deep divide in Germany between a government—led by the Social Democrat Olaf Scholz—eager to continue the war in Ukraine, and a population that wants this war to end and for their government to tackle the severe crisis of inflation. The heart of the matter, said Wagenknecht and Dağdelen, is the attitude to the war. Die Linke, they argue, simply did not come out strongly against the Western backing of the war in Ukraine and did not articulate the despair in the population. “If you argue for the self-destructive economic warfare against Russia that is pushing millions of people in Germany into penury and causing an upward redistribution of wealth, then you cannot credibly stand up for social justice and social security,” Wagenknecht told me. “If you argue for irrational energy policies like bringing in Russian energy more expensively via India or Belgium, while campaigning not to reopen the pipelines with Russia for cheap energy, then people simply will not believe that you would stand up for the millions of employees whose jobs are in jeopardy as a result of the collapse of whole industries brought about by the rise in energy prices.”

Scholz’s approval rating is now at 17 percent, and unless his government is able to solve the pressing problems engendered by the Ukraine war, it is unlikely that he will be able to reverse this image. Rather than try to push for a ceasefire and negotiations in Ukraine, Scholz’s coalition of the Social Democrats, the Greens, and the Free Democrats, say Dağdelen, “is trying to commit the people of Germany to a global war alongside the United States on at least three fronts: in Ukraine, in East Asia with Taiwan, and in the Middle East at the side of Israel. It speaks volumes that Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock even prevented a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza at the Cairo summit” in October 2023.

Indeed, in 2022, Thuringia’s prime minister and a Die Linke leader, Bodo Ramelow, told Süddeutsche Zeitung that the German federal government must send tanks to Ukraine. When Wagenknecht called Gaza an “open-air prison” in October 2023, the Die Linke parliamentary group leader Dietmar Bartsch said that he “strongly distanced” himself from her (the phrase “open-air prison” to describe Gaza is used widely, including by Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967). “We have to point out what is happening here,” Dağdelen tells me, “It is our duty to organize resistance to this collapse of Die Linke’s anti-war stance. We reject Germany’s involvement in the U.S. and NATO proxy wars in Ukraine, East Asia, and the Middle East.”

Controversies

On February 25, 2023, Wagenknecht and her followers organized an anti-war protest at Brandenburg Gate in Berlin that drew 30,000 people. The protest followed the publication of a “peace manifesto,” written by Wagenknecht and the feminist writer Alice Schwarzer, which has now attracted over a million signatures. The Washington Post reported on this rally with an article headlined, “Kremlin tries to build antiwar coalition in Germany.” Dağdelen tells me that the bulk of those who attended the rally and those who signed the manifesto are from the “centrist, liberal, and left-wing camps.” A well-known extreme right-wing journalist, Jürgen Elsässer tried to take part in the demonstration, but Dağdelen—as video footage shows—argued with him and told him to leave. Everyone but the right-wing, she says, was welcome at the rally. However, both Dağdelen and Wagenknecht say their former party—Die Linke—tried to obstruct the rally and demonized them for holding it. “The defamation is intended to construct an enemy within,” Dağdelen told me. “Vilifying peace protests is intended to put people off and simultaneously mobilize support for repugnant government policies, such as arms supply to Ukraine.”

Part of the controversy around Wagenknecht is about her views on immigration. Wagenknecht says that she supports the right to political asylum and says that people fleeing war must be afforded protection. But, she argues, the problem of global poverty cannot be solved by migration, but by sound economic policies and an end to the sanctions on countries like Syria. A genuine left-wing, she says, must attend to the alarm call from communities who call for an end to immigration and move to the far-right AfD. “Unlike the leadership of Die Linke,” Wagenknecht told me, “we do not intend to write off AfD voters and simply watch as the right-wing threat in Germany continues to grow. We want to win back those AfD voters who have gone to that party out of frustration and in protest at the lack of a real opposition that speaks for communities.”

The point of her politics, Wagenknecht said, is not anti-immigration as much as it is to attack the AfD’s anti-immigrant stand at the same time as her party will work with the communities to understand why they are frustrated and how their frustration against immigrants is often a wider frustration with cuts in social welfare, cuts in education and health funding, and in a cavalier policy toward economic migration. “It is revealing,” she said, “that the harshest attacks on us come from the far-right wing.” They do not want, she points out, the new party to shift the argument away from a narrow anti-immigrant focus to pro-working-class politics.

Polls show that the new party could win 14 percent of the vote, which would be three times the Die Linke share and would make BSW the third-largest party in the Bundestag.

This article was produced by Globetrotter.


Vijay Prashad’s most recent book (with Noam Chomsky) is The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and the Fragility of US Power (New Press, August 2022).

The meltdown of Die Linke / by Sevim Dagdelen

(From left), Lukas Schoen, Amira Mohamed Ali, Sahra Wagenknecht, Ralph Suikat and Christian Leye arrive for a news conference to announce the founding of a precursor to a new party in Berlin, Germany, Monday October 23 2023

Reposted from the Morning Star (UK)



AT THE press conference announcing the new party project, Sahra Wagenknecht commented on the war in the Middle East. She condemned the terror attacks perpetrated by Hamas.

At the same time she described the Gaza Strip as an “open-air prison” and spoke of an “unbearable situation” while calling for a political solution with Palestinians having their own state within a two-state solution.

The chairman of the Die Linke (the Left party) parliamentary group in the German Bundestag, Dietmar Bartsch, criticised this immediately, saying: “I distance myself in the strongest possible terms from the term ‘open-air prison’ used to describe the Gaza Strip at the Wagenknecht press conference.”

Prior to this, the party chairman Martin Schirdewan appeared at a demonstration for solidarity with Israel without mentioning the bombing of the Gaza Strip or raising the call for a ceasefire at all.

We’re thus dealing with a complete collapse of anti-war positions within the Left party leadership. It was only after 120 countries voted in favour of a resolution calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in the United Nations general assembly that the leadership of the Left party could bring itself to join this demand — not particularly credible.

This full-scale policy meltdown in the Left party was long apparent, but was undoubtedly accelerated by the war in Ukraine, in which support for a self-destructive economic war against Russia raised the prospect of involvement in a Nato proxy war.

The prime minister of the federal state of Thuringia, Bodo Ramelow of the Left party, even called for German tanks to be sent to Ukraine.

A rose-tinted view of the war-waging pact Nato was taken. In an echo of the German social democratic majority during the first world war, we see war be used as a significant catalyst for watering down a party’s positions.

What is happening in plain sight in terms of anti-war positions is occurring no less significantly, albeit somewhat less visibly, in the areas of economic and social policy.

For five years now, the Left party leadership has sailed from one electoral defeat to the next. Closer inspection of the causes reveals that the working classes are increasingly less convinced that the party cares about their specific interests, first and foremost being social security and social justice.

Green-influenced identity politics are rightly understood by the broad majority of workers as a tacit attack on their class, causing them to vote with their feet.

At the same time as this loss of the working class is occurring, we see the rise of the political right wing, the so-called Alternative for Germany or AfD, which currently stands at over 20 per cent nationwide in opinion polls, moving far above 30 per cent in the east of the country, and is the strongest political force among the working class.

Wagenknecht and her allies are united by the conviction that things cannot continue as they have done, with a left-wing party dismantling itself by adopting the dominant opinions and thus fuelling the rise of the political right wing in Germany.

If the Left party leadership advocates policy that goes against the vast majority of the population, who support limitations, and even denounces this section of society as right-wing, it is doing the right wing’s work for it and downright driving voters into their arms.

Wagenknecht emphasised the defence for the right of asylum and at the same time the fight against the root causes of people forced to leave their home combined with the insight that global poverty cannot be solved by migration.

The decision to leave the Left party and to establish a new political force was not taken easily. Attempts were made for years to stop the party’s change in course and to warn of the ramifications from the devastating electoral losses. This was not possible and, in the end, the only choice left was to leave.

In Germany and in Europe we face a dramatic situation, one in which agreeing to the status quo would have spelt accompanying the party into political insignificance. Germany and Europe are undergoing extreme negative change.

As a result of the policies of the green, social-democrat, liberal coalition which supports US proxy wars around the world, has implemented an arms drive and a massive redistribution policy to the benefit of the super-rich, along with swingeing cuts to infrastructure and essential public services, and risks the country’s welfare by capping the import of affordable energy from Russia, monumental societal devastation looms — the result of which is that an increasing number of people in Germany no longer know if they will still be able to pay their energy bills, rent and groceries tomorrow.

What is needed to stop this organised downfall is a policy of economic reason and social justice, that does not join in with warmongering and sabre-rattling.

Without an awareness that in Europe we are currently dealing with a comprador bourgeoisie, operating like those in Latin America in the 1970s and representing primarily the interests of the United States and US investment funds, policy-making for working people will no longer be possible.

However, this also involves turning away from a European policy approach that focuses on a desire to hand over an increasing number of powers to the European Commission and the Council Secretariat, which operate often as transmission belts for US interests in Europe.

“We do not believe, I can say this now, that an increasing amount of power should be shifted to the European Commission. The commission is close to corporate lobbyists and very far away from the citizens,” Wagenknecht stated at the presentation of the new party project. Europe must be based on co-operation between sovereign states, she continued.

In opinion polls, 27 per cent of those asked in Germany say that they could conceive of voting for a party formed by “Alliance Sahra Wagenknecht — for economic reason and justice” (Buendnis Sahra Wagenknecht — Fuer wirtschaftliche Vernunft und Gerechtigkeit).

In specific election surveys, the party, which does not yet exist, stands at 12 or 15 per cent nationwide. This is of course just a snapshot, and things could look quite different tomorrow.

However, what it does show is how great the need is for a political force that fights for social justice and peace and pushes back against the catastrophic societal course set by the elites.

Just how dangerous the party, which does not yet exist, is already considered by the Establishment can however now be seen in the denunciation campaign already under way.

The most common ascriptions are that the party is “right-wing” and “pro-Putin.” We’ve already seen such denunciation in war propaganda. Those lobbying for a ceasefire in the Middle East are deemed supporters of the terrorist group Hamas.

Those who stand against the delivery of ever-greater numbers of increasingly heavy munitions to Ukraine are said to want an alliance with Putin.

As transparent as this propaganda is, people still repeatedly fall for it. This is also the case for the new party: those who call for the reopening of the pipelines from Russia, to ensure there is no longer any need for Russian energy to be procured more expensively via India and Belgium, as is currently the case, are labelled friends of Putin and excluded from the political dialogue.

Those who want to make policies for the majority of the population are denounced as right-wing — in order to sideline precisely these policies for the majority of the population.

It is our deep-held conviction that the incursion of war propaganda into the public discussion narrows this massively and has the sole aim of delegitimising left-wing alternatives focusing on peace and social justice from the outset. Not letting ourselves be taken for fools is thus our primary duty in these times.


Sevim Dagdelen has been a member of the German federal parliament (Bundestag) since 2005. She has been campaigning for years for the release of journalist and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is being held in Belmarsh high-security prison in Britain.