Opinion: Progressive wins on Primary Day / by Ethan Strimling

Beacon

Reposted from the Maine Beacon


With Primary Day 2024 behind us, my humble brag is that I got nine of 12 predictions correct in my Beacon column last week. 

My less humble brag, truth be told, is that, far from some deep analytical dive into persuadable percentages, I basically just picked the more progressive (or less right-wing-nutty) option for each prediction. People like to vote for a winner, so it was my small way to help, because no doubt my column made all the difference.

In all seriousness, I am thankful at how well progressives did last week, if not surprised. It is getting clearer by the day that Maine’s electorate wants a government that works for, invests in, and protects people over profit, hate, and corporate power.

With pro-choice Democrat Cassie Julia’s win in Waterville, we learned that even in a conservative Democratic stronghold, being against the right to abortion is bad for your political health, as Julia easily defeated the popular anti-choice incumbent Democratic Rep. Bruce White. We also saw powerful movement building with Planned Parenthood, Equality Maine, and Maine People’s Alliance (of which the Beacon is a project), joining forces to support Julia.

In Portland, while both Herb Adams and Yusef Yusef were progressive, voters clearly made a statement against the xenophobia pervasive in the Republican party. Yusef, who won by 25 points, has been in the country just 15 years, having fled the civil war in Somalia. He represents everything Republicans hate in that he shows what immigration creates—young entrepreneurs strengthening our economy and enhancing our community. 

Additionally, when Yusef is sworn in (there is no Republican running in this district), Portland’s delegation will be 30% people of color. A first for us, and a longtime coming for the state.

In Cape Elizabeth, newcomer Michelle Boyer won. By almost all accounts, the difference in this race was the forceful endorsement by outgoing incumbent Rep. Rebecca Millett, a trusted progressive voice. Also of note, by far the most conservative Democrat in the race (I think she would agree), former state Sen. Cynthia Dill came in third.

In the Midcoast, on races I didn’t predict, we got some of our best news of the night when two transphobes who had voted to repeal LGBTQ+ protections were replaced by pro-equality school board candidates. This small step in the battle for trans rights will save lives and hopefully the RSU 40 school board will move quickly to reverse the June 7 decision to eliminate local rules protecting trans students.

In Kennebunk, short-term rental restrictions won overwhelmingly. Maybe we are turning a corner in Maine and will actually start to reverse the damage Airbnb has done to our long-term housing market.

Even on the Republican side, there were slivers of hope. Two state legislator GOP incumbents were ousted by challengers. While neither really lost because they were too right-wing (their opponents will likely be just as bad), one lost because he never showed up for the job while still cashing his paycheck. It is good to see Republicans caring about work ethic in their elected leaders, especially since Donald Trump averaged 95 paid vacation days a year as president.

In the biggest race of the night, while I thought the GOP base would reward Mike Soboleski for his crazy conspiracy theories (jailing Dr. Anthony Fauci and that Trump won in 2020), I am glad I was wrong on this one. And while the guy who won, Austin Theriault, is certainly no reasonable Republican like Olympia Snowe or Bill Cohen (he’s an anti-abortion gun nut who was pushed by Trump afterall), he did once vote for safe injection sites and to decriminalize sex work. Hope?

Anyway, lots to appreciate from Primary Day 2024 in Maine. Onward to the general.


Ethan Strimling served for 10 years as the progressive mayor and state senator representing Portland. He also spent 19 years as the executive director of LearningWorks, a social service agency helping to break the generational cycle of poverty through education. Currently, he is a community organizer for progressive causes around the country, an active member of Maine DSA, and one third of the podcast “In The Arena” with Pat Callaghan and Phil Harriman.

“It’s progressing well”: How the Left is preparing for a Front against Front electoral contest / by Emilio Meslet

During a rally against the RN, Place Kléber in Strasbourg, June 10, 2024 | © Tobias Canales / Hans Lucas via AFP

Reposted from L’ Humanité


In sporting vocabulary, we call this gaining speed. Emmanuel Macron hoped to regain his health by relying on the division of the left, after months of a bitter European campaign which often turned into exchanges of pet names.

But the progressives avoided the crudely set trap by sealing Monday evening, June 10, at nightfall, the birth of an unprecedented union following the dissolution of the National Assembly: the new Popular Front. A rapid response to the demands of the left-wing people and organized civil society in view of these early legislative elections. A Popular Front to block the path of the RN, the heir to Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front.

“We wish to carry a program of social and ecological ruptures to build an alternative to Emmanuel Macron and combat the racist project of the far right”, write the signatory parties, which enact the principle of “single candidacies from the first round”. Here the Socialist Party (PS), France Insoumise (FI), the Ecologists, the French Communist Party (PCF) and Génération.s are back on the campaign trail together, as in 2022 with Nupes.

But, in another balance of power and a coalition format expanded to several groups: Place publique – which did not leave the negotiating table contrary to what the daily Opinion affirmed –, the Republican and Socialist Left (GRS), the Republican and Citizen Movement (MRC), the Left Radicals and even Engagement. The NPA – the Anticapitalist of Philippe Poutou and Olivier Besancenot – said it was ready to join the coalition.

“Don’t betray us”

In front of the headquarters of the Ecologists, in the center of Paris, where the pact was announced, hundreds of young people welcomed this new coalition with relief . “Don’t betray us,” they chanted in front of the main party leaders and a swarm of cameras. “It was our duty to respond to them to show that we could build together and not let despair set in. Taking this type of political action is engaging,” said Cyrielle Chatelain, president of the environmental group in the Assembly until the dissolution.

“The people of the left would not forgive us for not trying everything to beat the far right,” adds Christian Picquet, national member of the PCF executive committee and negotiator on the programmatic aspect. “Some forces realize the catastrophe to which division has led us,” says Aurélie Trouvé, a rebellious MP. We are now up against the wall but we have not fallen into the trap set by Emmanuel Macron.

The left therefore want to do things together. And this, despite the disagreements and the skirmishes observed during the European campaign. In just over twenty-four hours, the new political situation has swept away resentments with a clear objective: to block the RN, which threatens to come to power on the evening of July 7. “Unity means working on oneself, especially in such a historic moment,” concedes Corinne Narassiguin, senator and member of the PS leadership. We must move past the violence suffered during the European elections because we cannot procrastinate in the face of the extreme right.

The gathering is therefore established, but it now remains for the political forces to build it in record time. The deadline for submitting applications is Sunday, June 16, at 6 p.m., and some printers require that campaign materials be sent by Thursday, June 13. So we have to move quickly. This is why negotiations resumed on Tuesday morning, still at the Greens’ headquarters where two working groups, one on the program and the other on the sharing of constituencies, worked all day.

Disagreements to be resolved on the distribution of constituencies

In a room of the austere green premises, around fifteen emissaries are gathered around the table. They must agree, by Thursday morning, on a “legislative contract” detailing “the measures to be taken in the first 100 days of the government of the new Popular Front” . It would be based on the 2022 Nupes program , which would be enriched and adjusted according to the new balance of power resulting from the last election in which the socialists came in first. “It’s progressing well,” whispered various negotiators to Humanity .

The discussions started with angry subjects, notably international subjects such as Ukraine. “Everyone must make compromises,” says Christian Picquet. We are working on formulations that allow everyone to find their way around. » At the end of the afternoon, they had not yet discussed the other subjects, some of which were more difficult (nuclear) than others (retirement at 60).

Elsewhere, the atmosphere is a little more tense. This is where the allocation of constituencies is negotiated. The fate of the 150 outgoing deputies seems secure, even if a few cases (Adrien Quatennens, Julien Bayou, etc.) may give rise to debate. Building on its score in the European elections (13.8%) , the Socialist Party wants to obtain more than the 70 constituencies where it had presented candidates. Particularly in Occitanie where the regional president, Carole Delga, hostile to the Nupes, joined the new Popular Front.

But rebellious France had difficulty letting go, although Aurélie Trouvé says she wants “everyone to make concessions”. By all accounts, Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s party cannot hope to renew candidates in 326 territories.

The Ecologists, whose weight has fallen with a score of 5.5% , risks serving as an adjustment variable and losing some of their nominations. As for the PCF, it should be able to present at least 50 candidates, as in 2022, while demanding constituencies where conquests are possible. “We do politics, not mathematics,” says Pierre Lacaze, responsible for elections at the PCF. We want an agreement that respects everyone and is based on local realities to beat the RN deputies. In 2022, only one MP had taken over a constituency from the far right. He was a communist.

The Prime Minister’s question will be inevitable

Once these two subjects have been decided to allow future candidates to quickly leave for the campaign, a third working group will be brought together between the staffs to define a strategy. The question of the incarnation of this coalition will then arise: should we designate a candidate for the post of prime minister to oppose Jordan Bardella (RN) and Gabriel Attal (Renaissance) or present a collective to the French? “It is the collective which will initiate the dynamic but the question of the Prime Minister will be inevitable ,” says socialist Corinne Narassiguin. One thing is shared between the different formations, except at the FI, this campaign cannot be carried out to the music of “Jean-Luc Mélenchon prime minister” , as in 2022, although the latter welcomed the agreement by assuring “ throw the grudge into the river” on his blog.

The personal initiative of Raphaël Glucksmann (Place publique), who proposed on France 2 the former number 1 of the CFDT Laurent Berger for the position, also turned the tables on the discussions. “His flight was irresponsible and endangers the collective, at a time when we are making lace ,” judges a negotiator.

The name of François Ruffin begins to gather supporters. It appears today to be the most advanced and the most consensual. But making this choice today seems premature for many actors in the new Popular Front. “We have several profiles to embody the union, but if we skip the steps, we are shooting ourselves in the foot,” warns a socialist.

Like part of the Greens, Fabien Roussel, national secretary of the PCF, is on the same line: “We want to put forward a team rather than a person. A prime minister is decided based on a majority in the National Assembly. We must therefore wait for the result from the polls. Until then, we will embody the Popular Front with different personalities who will attend the debates.

Especially since the 2024 gathering is intended to be broader than that of 2022, ranging from Jean-Luc Mélenchon to Carole Delga via Arnaud Montebourg, Sandrine Rousseau and even Léon Deffontaines. This is what we call the spirit of responsibility.


Emilio Meslet is a political/ecological reporter and film critic

South Africa’s ANC loses 30-year parliamentary majority after election / by Aljazeera and News Agencies

A woman votes during the South African elections, on Robben Island, the prison off the coast of Cape Town [File:Nic Bothma/Reuters]

African National Congress vote share drops to 40 percent, forcing it to seek coalition partners to form government

Reposted from Aljazeera


The African National Congress (ANC) party has lost its parliamentary majority in a historic election result that puts South Africa on a new political path for the first time since the end of the apartheid system of white minority rule 30 years ago.

With more than 99 percent of votes counted on Saturday, the once-dominant ANC had received nearly 40 percent in Wednesday’s election, well short of the majority it had held since the famed all-race vote of 1994 that ended apartheid and brought it to power under Nelson Mandela.

The main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance (DA), had 21.63 percent and uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK), a new party led by former president and ANC leader Jacob Zuma, managed to grab 14.71 percent – pulling away votes from the ANC.

Opposition parties have hailed the result as a momentous breakthrough for a country struggling with deep poverty and inequality, but the ANC remained the biggest party by some way.

“The way to rescue South Africa is to break the ANC’s majority and we have done that,” said main opposition leader John Steenhuisen.

The final results are still to be formally declared by the independent Electoral Commission that ran the election, but the ANC cannot pass 50 percent.

Reporting from the Results Operation Centre in Midrand, South Africa, Al Jazeera’s Mike Hanna said the ANC will try to find a way to form a new government.

“It [ANC] has to find a partner in order to be able to govern. Otherwise it could try to form a minority government which could make it very difficult to pass any form of legislation or advance ANC policy,” he said.

Gwede Mantashe, the ANC chair and current mines and energy minister, told reporters in comments broadcast by the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC): “We can talk to everybody and anybody,” dodging a question about who the party was discussing a possible coalition deal with.

Political parties’ shares of the vote determine their seats in the country’s National Assembly, which elects the nation’s president.

President Cyril Ramaphosa can in theory still keep his job, as the former liberation movement was on course to get about twice as many votes as the next party. But he will be weakened and could face calls to quit both from opposition parties and critics in the deeply divided ANC.

On Friday, however, a top ANC official backed him to stay on as party leader, and analysts say he has no obvious successor.

A deal to keep the ANC in the presidency could involve opposition backing in exchange either for cabinet posts or for more control of parliament, perhaps even the speaker.

The election commission has pencilled in a final results announcement for Sunday.


Aljazeera

What to know about voting in the June 11 primary in Maine / by AnnMarie Hilton

Entrance to the polling station in Portland’s Merrill Auditorium. (Jim Neuger/Maine Morning Star)

Reposted from Maine Morning Star


It’s not too soon to start making a voting plan for the state primary election that is only a few weeks away on June 11. 

This election will not only narrow the field for state senators, state representatives, and county commissioners, but also determine which Republican candidate will face off against Democrat Jared Golden to represent Maine’s 2nd Congressional District. 

Party candidates who are elected in the primary qualify to appear on the November general election ballot. 

Here’s a closer look at what voters need to know.

Who can vote in this primary?

Voters enrolled in the Democratic, Republican and Green Independent parties, as well as those who are unenrolled, may vote in the June primary. Unenrolled voters will select either the Democratic, Republican or Green Independent ballot. 

Anyone enrolled in any other party may not participate in the primary. 

The deadline to withdraw or change one’s enrollment and still be eligible to vote in this primary is May 24. Voters must be in a party for three months before changing to another.

All voters can participate in school board referendums. 

Absentee or early voting

In Maine, any voter can apply to vote absentee without having a specific reason. 

Voters have until the end of the business day on June 6 to request absentee ballots from their municipal clerk. They can be requested online, by mail or by phone. Residents can search the list of municipal clerks and registrars on the Secretary of State website to find more details about obtaining and casting an absentee ballot. 

Ballots must be completed and returned to the clerk by 8 p.m. on June 11. They can be returned via mail or dropped off in designated, external ballot boxes. For example, Portland has a box outside of City Hall. 

Ahead of the election, people may also vote absentee in-person at their local clerk’s office once ballots become available. In Portland, in-person absentee voting begins May 14. 

The Secretary of State also has a tracking system for residents to check the status of their request as well as their ballot after returning it. 

New accommodations for voters

Maine voters can use the online voter registration portal to register to vote for the first time, update their current registration, or change their party enrollment. 

New this year, voters who will be at least 65 years old by the next election or who self-identify as having a disability can apply for ongoing absentee voter status, according to the Secretary of State’s office. 

The application form can be downloaded online and must be returned to their municipal clerk. Voters who qualify will automatically receive absentee ballots for each statewide, municipal and any other election they are eligible to vote in. 


AnnMarie Hilton grew up in a suburb of Chicago and studied journalism at Northwestern University. Before coming to Maine, she covered education for newspapers in Wisconsin and Indiana.

A New President for Ecuador, Tied to the United States Already / by William T. Whitney Jr.

The Banana Prince: Presidential candidate Daniel Noboa, of the National Democratic Action Alliance political party, center, rides atop a truck to attend his closing campaign rally in Santa Elena, Ecuador, Thursday, Oct. 12, 2023. The heir to a banana fortune, Noboa was Washington’s pick in the election. | Martin Mejia / AP

South Paris, Maine


Second-round presidential voting took place in Ecuador on October 15. With 90% of the votes counted, the winner was 35-year-old Daniel Noboa of the National Democratic Action Alliance, heir of a vast business fortune. He gained 52.08% of the votes, while his opponent, lawyer Luisa González, representing the progressive Citizen’s Revolution party took 47.92 %

González had defeated Noboa in the first round of voting on August 20 with her 33.6% to his 23.4%. By then, eight political leaders had been assassinated including a mayor, two municipal councilors, a legislative candidate, and presidential candidate. Campaigning for the second round, the candidates wore body armor, traveled in bulletproof vehicles, and were surrounded by large security detachments.

Noboa will be completing the presidential term of banker Guillermo Lasso who, elected in 2021, was facing impeachment on corruption charges as of May 2023.  Lasso arranged for his own departure. By dissolving the National Assembly, he triggered a constitutionally-required presidential election, just accomplished. Noboa will be serving only 17 months. The regular election cycle resumes in 2025.

Candidate González offered plans for economic justice, “dignified work,” protecting women, labor rights, but also crime prevention and “citizen security.” She emphasized support for the legacy of the Rafael Correa government (2007-2017) which expanded access to healthcare and education, fought poverty, and strengthened the national economy.

Noboa’s campaign featured lavish spending on publicity and campaign events, and on gifts and favors for his followers. 

His election compounds difficulties for working, indigenous, and marginalized Ecuadorans. One analysis sees him as continuing an “Ecuadorian capitalism based on state resources, tax evasion and super exploitation of workers,” which, after President Correa’s ten-year-long government, “consolidated into an agro-exporter-commercial-banking kind of capitalism.” Presidents Moreno and Lasso were the consolidators, from 2017 on.

For Ecuadorian sociologist Irene León, the elections centered on the “geo-economy,” which is about “priorities set by foreign capital and big corporations and implemented by local capitalists seeking to position themselves in the stateless dynamic of the world market.”

Emblematic of president-elect Daniel Noboa’s ties to U.S. business and politics are his degrees from the Stern School of Business at NYU, Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, and from George Washington University.

León refers to “actors involved in the business of destruction and reconstruction, [who] sell scenarios of chaos and models of security, along with arms, intelligence, and mercenaries.” She laments that Ecuador was one of the safest counties in the region and now is one of the most violent.

The election of Noboa suited U.S. government purposes for Ecuador. Proponents of social and economic reform gained little traction and Ecuador shows every sign of remaining open to investments, extraction and export of natural resources, and U.S. overview generally. The way had been prepared.  

President Lasso in 2021 signed one decree that deregulated operational processes in oil and gas extraction and another that sought to increase mining exports.  Under Presidents Moreno and Lasso, “Ecuador-China ties weaken[ed] in the fields of technology, lending, and investment.” And as “Ecuador has grown more skeptical of China, the United States has stepped in to court the Andean country,” according to Global Americans.

As pointed out by that apologist for the two countries’ “deeper engagement,” “Ecuador is estimated to hold a prodigious source of extractable reserves including antimony, copper, iron ore, silver, and world-class gold deposits.”

Now the U.S. government is fashioning a new hold on Ecuador.  It will be providing security, mostly by way of collaboration again narco-trafficking. The effect will be to defend the status quo there.

Uruguayan Journalist Aram Aharonian recently outlined Ecuador’s new role in Latin America as a major transit point for illegal drugs on their way to North America. He notes that the “total production worldwide” of materials for producing cocaine is “concentrated” in Latin America, which is a major source too of marijuana and opioids.    

There are two major routes. One flows from cities and ports in Brazil, Paraguay, Argentina, and Uruguay to Europe. The other, the “Amazonian route,” has illicit drugs leaving from Peru and Colombia to Pacific port cities, primarily in Ecuador, and from there to Central America and on to the United States.  

Ecuador’s Pacific coast is “under the control of criminal narco-trafficking gangs” That Ecuador uses the U.S. dollar as its national currency underlies the big business there of laundering drug money.

Ecuador since 2019 has become one of the most violent countries in the world. There were fewer than 1000 murders per year before then, 2,500 violent deaths in 2022, and 4,200 murders so far this year.

As a journalist and a politician, presidential candidate Fernando Villavicencio had denounced the gangs and corruption. He was assassinated on August 9. The BBC reported that on October 7, seven Colombian men accused of killing Villavicencio were found murdered in Ecuadorian prisons.

U.S. military intervention has a new lease on life in Ecuador. That’s a far cry from 2009 when the Ecuadorian government of President Correa forced the U.S. military to abandon its large base near the coastal city of Manta.

General Laura Richardson, Commander of the U.S. Southern Command, was present in September, 2022 as the U.S. government delivered $730,000 worth of military equipment to an Ecuadorian Army brigade. State department representatives 11 months later “delivered $3.1 million of support to units of the Ecuadorian Armed Forces.

The Department’s press release mentioned “maritime interdiction operations along the northern border and associated Amazonian waterways” and “fight against drug trafficking, organized crime, human trafficking, illegal mining, and other threats.”

On September 27, the Biden administration took the occasion of President Lasso’s visit to Washington to sign an agreement that permits U.S. troops to be deployed in Ecuador, primarily on land and at sea along Ecuador’s coast, which is seen as an area “much affected by drug cartels operating in the region.”

Broadcasting the special U.S. relationship with Ecuador is The United States-Ecuador Partnership Act of 2022. Part of the National Defense Authorization Act that became law on December 23, 2022, the Partnership Act “includes measures for strengthening democratic governance in Ecuador and increasing security cooperation and economic and commercial ties between the two countries. The now disgraced Senator Bob Menendez had proposed the law.

For the U.S. government, the precedent would be U.S. Plan Colombia, which, initiated in 2000, provided for U.S. military intervention ostensibly against drug trafficking.  The effect has been to establish Colombia as a U.S. beachhead in a region full of wealth, but also of tensions and possibilities of popular uprisings.

A great unknown for those in charge in Ecuador is the prospect of a political uprising of indigenous people in style of, in varying degrees, Bolivia, Peru, and Chile. Protection from the U.S. government represents a crude sort of insurance protection.


W.T. Whitney Jr. is a political journalist whose focus is on Latin America, health care, and anti-racism. A Cuba solidarity activist, he formerly worked as a pediatrician, lives in rural Maine. W.T. Whitney Jr. es un periodista político cuyo enfoque está en América Latina, la atención médica y el antirracismo. Activista solidario con Cuba, anteriormente trabajó como pediatra, vive en la zona rural de Maine.

What’s on the November ballot in Maine — and what it means / by Evan Popp

Photo by Drew Angerer | Getty Images

Originally published in the Maine Beacon on August 1, 2023


Maine’s November ballot will be busy, with eight measures for voters to consider, including a high-profile question about whether to replace the state’s embattled investor-owned utility companies, Central Maine Power and Versant, with a consumer-owned model. 

Last week, the Secretary of State’s Office released the order of referendum questions that Mainers will weigh in November, determined by a public lottery drawing. Here are those questions, listed in the order in which they will appear on the ballot. 

Question 1

Question 1 asks if voters “want to bar some quasi-governmental entities and all consumer-owned electric utilities from taking on more than $1 billion in debt unless they get statewide voter approval?” 

As Beacon previously reported, the initiative is being run by opponents of the campaign to replace CMP and Versant with a consumer owned utility (Question 3), in the hopes that even if that referendum is approved, voters would be forced to consider the policy again in a subsequent referendum if Question 1 passes. 

No Blank Checks, the group backing the debt referendum, has received the bulk of its funding over the years from Avangrid, CMP’s parent company.  

Question 2

This ballot referendum asks whether Mainers want to “ban foreign governments and entities that they own, control, or influence from making campaign contributions or financing communications for or against candidates or ballot questions.” 

Advocates gathered the number of signatures needed to place the measure on the ballot this November, but also attempted to pass the reform through the legislature. They succeeded in doing so, but Gov. Janet Mills vetoed the bill, effectively sending the policy to the ballot instead.

Proponents of the reform, which is being spearheaded by the group Protect Maine Elections, say the bill is needed to limit the large sums of money being spent on referendums by foreign entities and companies strongly linked with foreign entities. 

Question 3

Question 3 asks whether voters want to create a “new power company governed by an elected board to acquire and operate existing for-profit electricity transmission and distribution facilities in Maine.” 

As Beacon previously reported, the referendum, if approved, would create the Pine Tree Power Company, a consumer-owned utility that would replace CMP and Versant and provide power to most municipalities in Maine. The referendum was spurred by CMP and Versant’s poor customer satisfaction rankings and high rates. Supporters say Question 3 would boost reliability and lower prices by creating a utility that focuses primarily on investing money into improving and updating the grid, rather than generating profits for shareholders.

Backers of the effort, which is being run by the Pine Tree Power campaign, also believe the reform would speed along Maine’s clean energy transition. Maine’s grid will need $10 billion to $15 billion in investments for the transition from fossil fuels to renewable electricity. Companies like CMP and Versant would finance those upgrades in an expensive way, adding to their profits, according to the Pine Tree Power campaign. In contrast, the proposed consumer-owned utility would borrow at a much lower rate, allowing that transition to happen at a more cost effective price.

Question 4

Also on the ballot in November will be an initiative asking Mainers if they want to mandate that automakers share repair information with independent car shops.

Advocates of the measure argue that the reform — known as the “right to repair” — would safeguard the ability of customers to fix a product themselves or go to an entity other than the manufacturer to fix the product. Several other state have enacted similar policies. 

Question 5

Questions 5 through 8 are proposed constitutional amendments drafted by the legislature and passed by the House and Senate with a two-thirds majority. 

Question 5 seeks to amend the constitution to give the Secretary of State’s Office more time in certain circumstances to process petition signatures for a referendum campaign. Currently, the deadline for the agency is 100 calendar days from when the petitions were submitted to the elections division, which has created an intense workload for the department. The proposed bill would keep that in place, unless referendum petitions are filed within 30 days before or after a general election. In that case, the review must be completed within 100 days after the 30th calendar day following the general election.  

Question 6

This proposed constitutional amendment asks voters if they want to require that all provisions of the state constitution be included in official printed copies of the document prepared by the secretary of state. 

The amendment has been pushed by advocates such as the Wabanaki Alliance as a way of ensuring that a part of the constitution pertaining to Maine’s treaty obligations to Indigenous people is restored to all printed copies of the document. 

Question 7

On Question 7, Mainers are being asked if they favor a constitutional amendment to remove a requirement that a person circulating a proposed ballot initiative be a resident of Maine and a registered voter in the state.

The question notes that those requirements have been found unconstitutional by a federal court. 

Question 8

Finally, this question asks if voters want to amend the constitution to “remove a provision prohibiting a person under guardianship for reasons of mental illness from voting for Governor, Senators and Representatives.” 

The phrasing of the question explains that this provision was found to violate the U.S. Constitution and federal law (all the way back in 2001 by the United States District Court for the District of Maine). Prior to that ruling, voters had turned back attempts to repeal the provision in 1997 and 2000. 


Evan Popp studied journalism at Ithaca College and interned at the Progressive magazine, ThinkProgress and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. He then worked for the Santa Fe New Mexican newspaper before joining Beacon. Evan can be reached at evan@mainebeacon.com.

“We must build an alternative” / by Matthew Cunningham-Cook

Philadelphia mayoral candidate Helen Gym. (AP Photo / Matt Rourke)

Originally published: The Lever  on May 15, 2023


When private equity threatened to destroy a 133-year-old hospital, Helen Gym, a former teacher and parent organizer turned first-term Philadelphia City Council member, sprung into action.

“How corrupt is it for an investment banker and a real estate company to come in and buy a major medical hospital in the poorest large city in the country?” Gym’s voice boomed out to a crowd of hundreds in front of Hahnemann University Hospital in central Philadelphia at a July 2019 rally with Sen. Bernie Sanders (Ind.-Vt.), one the first times Gym’s organizing work caught national attention.

And how wrong are our laws when Joel Freedman and his cohort of vulture capitalists can run this hospital into the ground in less than 18 months and now they’re going to flip it for a real estate deal?

Just three weeks before, Joel Freedman, a private equity executive, had announced that he was closing the hospital. It was one of just five hospitals that could treat trauma patients, and one of just six hospitals where people could give birth, in the sixth-largest city in America.

Now Gym, after two terms on city council, is running for Philadelphia mayor on an ambitious platform to invest in and expand public institutions, especially health care and schools. If she wins in the Democratic primary on Tuesday, overcoming an entrenched Democratic Party establishment and powerful billionaires opposing her insurgent campaign, she will also confront Philadelphia’s major health and housing disparities. These deep inequities are a microcosm of yawning nationwide problems of which the federal government has effectively washed its hands.

Gym’s campaign–which is currently leading in the most recent poll for the race–asks a far-reaching question: In the most unequal country in the industrialized world, what can one city do to address the national health care and housing crises fueled by global financiers?

“I’m not running for office because I want to be a mayor per se,” Gym told The Lever in January. “I’m running for office because we have to dramatically change the way this city takes care of its own people from babies to senior citizens.” Gym speaks warmly and deliberately, with a candor that has endeared her to the city’s splintered activist communities and made powerful enemies, including the local Chamber of Commerce and the editorial board of the Philadelphia Inquirer.

“I want to be able to show people that the government has a powerful role to play,” she added.

What’s transformative about that is to lead with a real people’s movement focused on the essentials of life: safety, housing, education, health care, the environment.

On the city council, Gym has fought the city’s business lobby to protect workers rights and promote safe schools. And while much of her campaign has been framed around public well-being and safety, her politics are actually best understood at an institutional level–in her unsuccessful but still transformative fight to save a century-old hospital.

Fighting To Save A Hospital

Philadelphia is the poorest big city in America. A progressive bastion in an increasingly blue state, the city is racially diverse and has growing inequality. It’s one of the few remaining American cities where organized labor plays a major role in political life, with more than 150,000 people represented by a union in a city of 1.6 million. In recent years, more than half-a-dozen progressives and socialists claimed victories in various offices.

In 2001, Gym was a mom sending her kids to public school, dismayed at the state takeover of the city’s education system–and joined other parent-activists seeking better resources for the city’s desperately underfunded public schools. In 2015, she ran for the city council, and in 2019, she was reelected as the highest vote-getter in the Democratic primary. In both campaigns, championing public schools and improving health care were central tenets of her platform.

When Hahnemann faced sudden closure in 2019, no elected official was more vocal than Gym about the dangers the shutdown foretold. Those warnings came to fruition less than a year later, when COVID-19 ravaged the city and killed more than 5,500 people.

Gym’s role in the effort to save Hahnemann from private equity managers who prioritized profits over patient care is a story that has never been fully told.

At the time, I worked as the staff researcher for the main nurses and health care professionals union in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania Association of Staff Nurses and Allied Professionals (PASNAP), which represented 800 nurses at Hahnemann.

Hahnemann University Hospital was founded in 1885 as a teaching hospital for homeopathic medical students and later established itself as a center for traditional medicine in the city. In 1986, it became the city’s first Level 1 trauma center–the highest designation for treating trauma patients. The development was critically important in a city beset with a major gun violence epidemic.

In the late 1980s, a new nonprofit, the Pittsburgh-based Allegheny Health and Education Research Foundation (AHERF), began to transform the state’s hospitals. AHERF went on a Wall Street-backed buying spree of Pennsylvania health care assets, purchasing Hahnemann in 1993, but then filing for bankruptcy just five years later, in what was then the largest nonprofit health care bankruptcy ever.

AHERF’s Philadelphia assets were sold to Tenet Healthcare, what is now the second-largest publicly traded hospital firm. Hahnemann eventually affiliated with Drexel University, becoming the fifth-largest medical school in the U.S., and continued to serve vulnerable populations. Up to its closure, a majority of its patients had public health insurance or none at all.

By 2016, nurses at Hahnemann had become so frustrated that they overwhelmingly voted to unionize with PASNAP. But the following year, the hospitals were sold again, this time to Joel Freedman, a private equity manager backed by MidCap Financial, a subsidiary of Apollo Global Management, a major private equity firm with a long history of problems, including delivering subpar returns and associations with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Immediately, Hahnemann was saddled with onerous debt service payments several points higher than common commercial rates, leaving the hospital with fewer resources to shore up its troubled finances.

Freedman initially made pledges to invest in the hospital–and agreed to a contract with the nurses that contained precedent-setting language on safe staffing. But the hospital’s already-shaky finances were further stressed by the new private equity model. When MidCap sent in a notice of default to Freedman in May 2019, the hospital was on the verge of collapse.

When Freedman announced Hahnemann’s imminent closure the following month, hospital staff braced for the worst. Hahnemann employed nearly 10 percent of PASNAP’s membership, and the union’s research showed that the hospital’s closure would further stress the city’s already-overburdened emergency rooms.

Today, among the hospitals that ended up taking most of Hahnemann’s patients in Philadelphia, ER wait times are about a half hour longer than the average hospitals in Pennsylvania, according to a Lever analysis of federal health care data. Health care workers around the city reported that ERs near Hahnemann became burdened with additional patients in the immediate aftermath of the hospital’s closure.

Previous closures of hospital maternity wards in Philadelphia had led to increases in infant mortality as high as 50 percent, researchers from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia found in 2012.

The Hahnemann workers quickly found an ally in Gym, who had long been close with PASNAP’s former president, Patty Eakin. Eakin, a recently retired emergency room nurse at Temple University Hospital, said that Gym immediately jumped into action.

“Helen was furious when they closed Hahnemann,” said Eakin.

Because Hahnemann was a safety net hospital. There were lots of patients who depended on it for care, and would now need to travel great distances. She was very sharp in her critique of a private equity company and a bottom feeder like Joel Freedman buying a hospital and running it into the ground.

Samir Sonti, a labor studies professor at the City University of New York, had just started as PASNAP’s political organizer when Hahnemann’s closure became imminent, and noted her response was very different from the common politician’s response. Sonti said,

[Helen] was one of the first electeds that we spoke to. From the first conversation onward she was strategizing with us over how we could build a campaign to save Hahnemann. At no point was it about her using it as a political opportunity–she used it as an organizer.

Gym appeared at every union event, pressed for financial resources to support Hahnemann, pushed the city and state Departments of Health to block Hahnemann’s closure, and pressured Freedman to stop the disorderly closure of the hospital.

But as financial pressure mounted, real estate vultures were circling: Hahnemann sat on valuable real estate in Center City Philadelphia. And other hospitals wouldn’t throw their weight behind saving Hahnemann, eager to absorb its patient population and lucrative medical residencies.

The CEO of Thomas Jefferson University, the city’s second-largest hospital network, Stephen Klasko, wrote an email in April 2019–prior to Hahnemann’s bankruptcy and subsequent closure–saying,

No, we don’t need Hahnemann. In fact, we need many less hospitals.

Despite routine marches in front of the hospital, including the July 2019 rally headlined by Gym and Sanders, real estate pressure and hospital competition was overwhelming. By the summer, it was clear that Hahnemann was not salvageable; more powerful politicians than Gym had largely given up on it while private interests moved in. By August, the hospital had no patients and was effectively shut down.

But Gym was energized to increase her efforts to fight for progressive values in Philadelphia. Today, she remains firm that public investment and ownership is the answer to privatization:

What is most important right now is a really strong government sector that looks out for the people. Local governments have an enormous amount of power, and an enormous amount of responsibility as well.

Gym went on to pass legislation that would crack down on disorderly hospital and nursing home closures, which the mayor signed in December of 2019.

Gym connected Hahnemann’s plight to poor state and national hospital regulations. Nationwide, hospital closures are major issues for cities and rural areas, reflecting a divestment of private interest in public health and the serious risks that come with for-profit ownership of hospitals.

“It is absolutely vital that local governments strengthen their responsibilities to the health and well being of our residents, because state and federal policies are so weak in this area” said Gym.

The Philadelphia region, meanwhile, is still vulnerable to hospital closures. In 2020, Mercy hospital in West Philadelphia substantially closed their inpatient operations and became an outpatient clinic, and private equity-owned Delaware County Memorial Hospital, right outside of the city in Upper Darby, closed at the end of 2022.

Gym’s Philadelphia

Inspired by what she learned in her fight to save Hahnemann, Gym said she sees Philly’s mayoral race as an opportunity to make the city a model for what can be accomplished in America as a whole: developing municipal responses to national problems.

“Progressives spent enormous sums of money and a lot of hair pulling to focus on Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, and Florida in the 2022 elections,” Gym said.

But at the municipal level, we can actually see a blueprint for the nation written through America’s largest cities. Philadelphia is a Democratic city. And that means that it should demonstrate what the country could and should look like, in the next 10 to 20 years.

Critical to Gym’s overall perspective on Philadelphia’s public health is the city’s school system. Philadelphia’s public schools have been routinely closed to deal with lead issues, which United States Public Interest Research Group, a federation of state-based consumer advocacy organizations, calls a “widespread” problem in Philadelphia’s schools.

Instead of recognizing Philly’s school crisis for what it is: an emergency, the city council and the current Mayor Jim Kenney’s administration have kicked the can down the road, cutting business and wage taxes that could have been used for lead abatement.

Gym and her two main progressive allies Kendra Brooks and Jamie Gauthier were the only members of the council to vote against the tax cuts. Gym has proposed a $10 billion city-wide Green New Deal, funded by property taxes and the city’s bonding authority to address the lead crisis.

Gym has also focused on the city’s housing crisis, with 48 percent of the city’s renters being considered as rent-burdened. In December 2021, the city council passed Gym’s landmark eviction diversion program which has been praised by the Biden White House, building on earlier legislation that Gym and her allies on Philadelphia’s 17-member city council had passed in June 2020. The program appears to have reduced evictions by about one third compared to pre-pandemic numbers.

Buttressing Gym’s broader vision for the city is her emphasis on workers’ rights. In December 2018, Gym won passage of the Fair Workweek legislation, which cracked down on unfair flex scheduling practices for workers, particularly in the retail industry. The legislation affects an estimated 130,000 workers.

“What we have demonstrated is a real push by everyday people to see a government that truly works for them,” Gym said,

But it starts at the local level by making sure that schools are safe and functioning and open and staffed and funded, by making sure that libraries and recreation centers are open and vibrant, that health care is not about just hospitals, but that health care is about meeting people’s needs, on the ground, and really connecting the government to its people.

Building An Alternative

Of the three frontrunners in the race, Gym is the only mayoral candidate running who has won citywide more than once, and she brings a loyal set of volunteers as the city’s progressive insurgency has bloomed.

Since 2019, when Gym was reelected and Brooks and Gauthier defeated incumbents to win seats on the council, Philadelphia’s progressives have experienced a resurgence. In 2020, Nikil Saval, a socialist writer and organizer, won election to the state Senate, and Rick Krajewski, also an organizer, won a spot in the state House.

In 2022, Tarik Khan, a nurse practitioner who had been active in the fight to save Hahnemann, defeated an incumbent to win a spot in the Pennsylvania House. Larry Krasner, the city’s progressive district attorney who has overseen a 40 percent reduction in the city’s jail population, was reelected with 67 percent of the vote in 2021, along with a slate of seven progressive judges.

On Sunday, Gym reprised her 2019 rally with Sanders, as he stumped for her with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).

This election comes on the heels of progressive Brandon Johnson’s April upset in Chicago’s mayoral election, backed by a comparable coalition of progressives and the city’s teachers union. There, Brandon Johnson campaigned on a platform that prioritized workers, emphasized investment in schools, and reimagined public safety. His trajectory could point to a similar opportunity for Gym.

Philadelphia, a city similarly hollowed out by disinvestment and energized by a progressive insurgency, can be a model for the nation. As corporate interests threaten the city’s future, Gym is naming and fighting privatization.

“We must build an alternative,” Gym concluded.

“I think that that is my life’s work, even before I ever came into office. It’s one of the most important things that I think politics needs to do right now. I think we’re very clear about our repudiation of Trumpism and the extreme right, but it will resonate if we live differently, as people deserve to live. And that is the most important thing for me in Philadelphia, that people’s lives have to actually be different.”


Matthew Cunningham-Cook is a researcher and writer focusing on capital markets, health care and retirement policy

Historic! Gustavo Petro wins elections in Colombia / by Martin Hacthoun

According to data from the National Registrar’s Office, Petro and Francia Marquez, his running mate, will govern Colombia after a triumph already described as historic in this country that has been for over 200 years under right-wing rule.

With 89.35 percent of the tables reported, Petro obtained 10 million 75 thousand 836 votes for 50.88 percent of the valid votes.

Hernandez, from the League of Anticorruption Leaders, got 46.85 percent of the votes. Colombia’s president-elect, Gustavo Petro, affirmed that today is a day of celebration for the people.

“Let them celebrate the first popular victory. May so much suffering be cushioned in the joy that today floods the heart of the Homeland”, expressed the leader of the Historical Pact in his Twitter account upon learning the results of the ballot, which declared him the winner.

He dedicated this victory for God and for the People and its history. “Today is the day of the streets and the squares,” emphasized Petro, who has called for a great national pact.

Leaders from the region sent the winning ticket messages of congratulations, specially the presidents of Argentina, Venezuela, Mexico and Cuba were the first to hail Petro’s victory.


Prensa Latina, June 19, 2022, https://www.plenglish.com/

‘He’s the only way’: how Lula allies hope he will end Bolsonaro era / by Tom Phillips in São Paulo

Former Brazilian head of state Lula da Silva launches presidential candidacy after Bolsonaro’s “irresponsible” rule | credit: AFP

Brazilian supporters hope to overturn far-right leader’s ‘reckless and criminal’ rule

A mesmerized hush fell over the crowd as João Camarero took to the stage with his seven-string guitar and plucked the opening notes of a national anthem that has become a symbol of the political struggle for Brazil’s soul.

“O land adored above all others, ’tis thee, Brazil,” sang the South American songstress beside him, Teresa Cristina, as thousands of spectators added their voices to the hymn’s call for a future of liberty and love.

Behind the musicians stood the man the audience hoped could make that dream reality: the former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who on Saturday announced he would seek to return to power in October’s election so as to end what he called Jair Bolsonaro’s era of tyranny, destruction and hate.

“Brazil needs to go back to being a normal country,” the 76-year-old leftwinger told elated supporters at a rally in São Paulo, many visibly moved by the rendition of a national anthem that has been appropriated by Bolsonaro’s far-right movement and which, along with the presidency, progressive Brazilians want to reclaim.

It was time, Lula declared, for Brazil to decide whether it wished to be a country of democracy or authoritarianism; truth or lies; tolerance or obscurantism; education or automatic rifles; environmental preservation or depredation.

“Never was it easier to choose – and never was it so important to make the right choice,” he said.

Supporters of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva cheer during the announcement on Saturday of his candidacy for the country’s presidential election. Photograph: André Penner/AP

There was euphoria below the stage as the former president, who governed from 2003 to 2011, outlined plans to build a more stable and compassionate country from the wreckage of Bolsonaro’s “reckless and criminal” rule under which Amazon deforestation has soared and more than 660,000 lives been lost to Covid-19.

“I feel I’m part of history … and we feel happy to be on the right side of history,” said Maria de Lourdes, a retired bank clerk who clutched a crêpe paper flower symbolising her yearning for change.

Polls suggest Lula should comfortably beat Bolsonaro, a Donald Trump-admiring nationalist whose radical rhetoric and calamitous coronavirus response mean he is abominated by many of Brazil’s 215 million citizens.

But analysts, and Lula allies, say Bolsonaro is a formidable political opponent with a ferociously loyal support base representing perhaps 25% of voters. To ensure victory, they believe the former president must build an invincible pro-democracy coalition stretching all the way from the hard-left to the centre-right.

“It’s important not just that Lula wins, but that Bolsonaro loses badly,” said the political columnist Celso Rocha de Barros, who fears that in the event of a narrow Lula victory Bolsonaro will refuse to concede, alleging fraud, and launch a coup to supposedly “reestablish democracy”.

Lula’s mission advanced at the weekend with the unveiling of his anti-Bolsonaro alliance, Vamos Juntos Pelo Brasil (Let’s Pull Together for Brazil). The bloc includes seven leftwing and centre-left parties and hopes to expand before the vote on 2 October.

As a gesture of his unifying intentions, Lula named Geraldo Alckmin, the centre-right former governor of São Paulo and a one-time presidential rival, as his running mate.

The Guardian last interviewed Alckmin in 2006 and the moderate conservative was trekking through Rio’s largest favela in search of votes to defeat Lula in that year’s presidential election. “Brazil has not grown,” Alckmin said of Lula’s first term in power, blaming his opponent for economic stagnation.

Times have changed. On Saturday, Alckmin urged voters to back his once-improbable partnership with Brazil’s first working-class leader. “Lula … isn’t the first, second or third way,” Alckmin said. “He’s the only way [to end] the most disastrous and cruel government” in Brazilian history.

Randolfe Rodrigues, a progressive senator who is part of Lula’s campaign team and tipped as a future minister, vowed to work tirelessly to build a multi-party alliance against Bolsonaro, a former paratrooper who openly celebrates the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from 1964 to 1985.

“Today was a starting point. Now we need to bring together all democrats,” Rodrigues said, claiming Bolsonaro’s relentless threats against Brazil’s young democracy meant the coming vote represented an extraordinary crossroads, for Brazil and the world.

“2022 isn’t an election like all of those which Brazil has held since the return of democracy. In none of the previous elections … was Brazilian democracy at stake,” Rodrigues said. “In 2022, it is.”

As Lula supporters streamed out of the auditorium and a giant Brazilian flag – another national symbol leftwingers are trying to wrestle back from the right – was removed from the stage, Rodrigues urged his country to seek inspiration from France, where rival politicians recently pulled together to defeat the far-right candidate Marine Le Pen in presidential elections.

“Macron’s victory was a balm for us Brazilians – the French gave us a great example that we must follow here in terms of tolerance and unity,” he said.

Rodrigues said the world was “living through a species of fascist international, represented by Trump in the United States, [Viktor] Orbán in Hungary and [Vladimir] Putin in Russia”.

Defeating that movement’s South American representative had global significance. “This is a civilizing mission,” he said.

The Guardian, May 7, 2022, https://www.theguardian.com/us